We occasionally get the odd person on the Forum who pops up and says he doesn't like this or that. My comment to them is always the same..."if you don't like it, don't read it".
A better comment is "If you don't like it challenge it"
But it seems if anybody, like Kowalski, dares to swim against the tide on here they get completely trashed and they themselves (not just their opinions) are normally labelled somewhere along the following "Pathetic" "Attention seeking" "Just out to get a reaction" etc etc
Surely you can be sensible enough to accept that if someone has a different opinion to you it doesn't necessarily mean they are just out to cause trouble! It may just mean
they have a different opinion to you I don't understand why that is so difficult for some of the forum mafia to accept!
I like it when opinions clash, and I know Fester does as well. I'd much rather read an interesting debate than 9 pages about trees or gardens or whatever. It's a shame that almost as soon as anyone interesting pops up they are driven away with a bombardment of often unnaceptable vitriol