So many valid points are getting lost, (or deliberately de-railed??)
Deliberately? Not suggesting a conspiracy, F?
by this obsession with correctness, semantics and the spurious accuracy seemingly required before being allowed to pass an opinion on this Forum.
I’m not actually sure you can have
false accuracy. Bit of an oxymoron, that, Fester. But let’s explore this a bit further.
If you mean the much savaged
Political correctness, I wonder if you’ve really thought it through? Do you believe it’s okay to paint images of groups in derogatory ways? And, if so, what groups would you be happy to see pilloried? Religious? Black? Gender-oriented? You were actually correct earlier, when you weren’t quite so...energised. It wasn’t
what was said, so much as
how it was being said. Generalised descriptions of groups by age as
‘elderly and decrepit’ is an example. The first adjective is fine, but the second is - to put it middy - highly offensive. Would you greet a customer by telling them they don’t look quite so decrepit this morning? I rather doubt it.
No one’s expecting anything other than we treat people with respect. And that includes references to the groups most responsible for keeping Llandudno going when the kids are still in school. I don’t think that’s being unreasonable.
Who cares what the PRECISE rainfall figures are in Llandudno compared to other towns? Because the original point still holds true.... which is, there is LITTLE or NOTHING to do when it DOES rain.
Well the problem is that when grossly uninformed or misleading things are being said in public that could easily have a seriously detrimental effect on the tourist industry then I believe they have to be corrected. And when statements such as
“if it rains - like it invariably does” are made I also believe those reading them should know the true state of affairs. It does not ‘
invariably’ rain. And we all know there’s little or nothing to do on those infrequent occasions when it rains. It’s been said before. Many, many times.
BUT... it is not wrong to point out things that could be improved, is it?
Of course it isn’t. That’s one main purpose of this forum. I’d only say two things: the same things are being said over and over again. The pier pavilion site is a prime example; it’s been done to death with every conceivable suggestion as to its future being made. And what difference has it ever made? Unless and until those responsible for decisions in CCBC engage with us on the forum or engage with the electorate then it’s unlikely things
will change.
But lastly, it’s essential people and groups of people are treated with respect. If points can’t be made without resorting to invective or abuse, then they shouldn’t be made.