I question the UK government's claims that there is no easy solution to the channel crossings/invasion. Australia has a method of dealing with illegal immigrants which has proved to be a success. This has existed for some time now.
In yesterday's paper Robert Jenrick is stated to have said that large asylum centres could be built around the UK. This is after some Conservative MPs criticised the housing of Channel migrants in hotels in deprived, tourist and remote areas. A series of Tory MPs said the use of hotels, costing taxpayers ?6.8 million a day, was, "wholly unsuitable" with asylum seekers put up in deprived areas, often with a lack of basic amenities. Jenrick told the Commons that, " We may need to take some larger sites to provide decent but basic accommodation. We want to exit the hotels as quickly as possible and to do that we need to disperse individuals to other forms of accommodation".
Tory ex minister Paul Maynard said that 400 asylum seekers were housed in the Metropole Hotel in Blackpool which is his seat. He stated that this was "the fourth most deprived ward in the country, an area with a host of social problems and a difficult history of child sex exploitation".
Where will it all end up? At this rate we shall have a vast number of illegal immigrants with who knows what sort of backgrounds.