The 3 Towns Arms

[Yorkie]

Roumainian wrote:
Welcome back Yorkie.     

Don't require any welcome back from you, thank you!

Good to see you.Takes great courage to do that after sucha dramatic wimpout.

No courage needed, I got broad shoulders and thick skin, and it was not a wimp out as you call it.  Again I find your comment insulting!

Us a******s and oddballs need to stick together don't we ole boy!!

I am not an A*****e or an Oddball, although glad to see you admit to your own position, and I certainly don't want to be associated with you in any way shape or form.  Again I find your references and choice of words insulting.

If numbers are just numbers why ask for them back?

Because I am proud of the contribution I have made to this Forum and the nice people I have met.  Until the last few days, of course.

[gwil]

 L0L


Yorkie. Yorkie, saying nothing would have been better. Remember the adage from your preRoumanian days. The one by Cicero regarding wise men and fools.

I can see were not going to get on but hopefully you wont talk down to any newcomers in future eh. Now you 've had a good chwipdin.

Sayonara old boy,au revoir, must go back to the homeland. I have an orphanage to run.

I'll ask someone to look up the insults exploding in the distance way back behind me.

[Yorkie]

Can't let it drop can you, must have the last word, must continue with telling others what to and what not to do.   

You call that a spanking?   More like the effect of a gentle summer breeze, doesn't even ruffle one's hair.   

I'll ask someone to look up the insults exploding in the distance way back behind me.

There will probably be plenty of them.   
Da boch!

[Trojan]

Probably a right sh** head when he takes that nappy off.

(referring to Fester's photo)

[Trojan]

Probably a right sh** head when he takes that nappy off.

Change of avatar Trojan?

DaveR says there was a record attendance on the forum yesterday. Maybe you though there was a couple of visits from this lot
http://www.searchlightmagazine.com/


 WWW

No, not really Pen, to me, a Golly symbol simply isn't racist.

[Fester]

I do seem to miss an awful lot, (the trials of working for a living I suppose)

Roumanian came onto the Forum ruffled a few feathers (mine included)  and it all started getting interesting.
After all, it did seem to me that Roumanian might have a lot to offer, judging by his intelligent and sarcastic style.

Yorkie was accused of deleting his account in a sulk, but unless I'm wrong, thats exactly what Roumanian has now done?

Roumanian? Or is it Gareth Williams? ...  where art thou?     

[Trojan]

I only ever had ONE account on the Llandudno Local, I do have a wife and adult children you know!   

 

[Ian]

After all, it did seem to me that Roumanian might have a lot to offer, judging by his intelligent and sarcastic style.

Apart from replacing 'sarcastic' with 'provocative', I'd agree. And our page views have never been higher.

[Fester]

I used the word 'sarcstic' as that was the term used by Roumanian to describe his own approach.

[Ian]

I know, but I think he came in hoping to stimulate debate and argument.

[DaveR]

He was certainly able to contribute a few well constructed arguments on a few of the debate threads, something we could do with more of.

[Yorkie]

Get him back on board then!   Do you have a contact?   I have no problem with him providing he leaves me alone.  I had enough s***e from odd balls when I had my own Forum, and I certainly don't want it repeated on this Forum.    

Maybe the other Members who were also affected by him will feel the same way.    

[Ian]

Do you have a contact?

No.

[DaveR]

I have no problem with him providing he leaves me alone.

As I mentioned before, if someone wants to be 'controversial', they have to learn to take it as well as give it. If you're happy to refer to people as 'a load of inefficient, unconcerned, apathetic, indifferent, uninterested bunch of tossers', then you must also be willing to receive similar in return surely? Oscar is a good example of this, he can be scathing at times but he also allows comments which vilify him personally.

[Yorkie]

As I mentioned before, if someone wants to be 'controversial', they have to learn to take it as well as give it. If you're happy to refer to people as 'a load of inefficient, unconcerned, apathetic, indifferent, uninterested bunch of tossers'

Can't recall using those words myself!   Don't you worry, I can give as good as I get, but do you want the Forum to degenerate into a constant slanging match?  I don't think so.  I can understand normal everyday criticism but it does not require people to be insulted and belittled.   Sensible and adult arguement and discussion is good for all.   If you wish to go down the Oscar road then that is, of course, your prerogative.

If you look at the early days of Oscar the Blog was extremely well written and contained excellent material written mainly by someone with journalistic experience.  Since then it has degenerated into just a load of back biting, personal insults, inuendo and filled with comments that do little to contribute to any sensible discourse.