Everything the writer leaves out. For instance, he says nothing about the details within the accounts, nothing about how offsets were employed to make the bottom line change, nothing about exactly how the final figure was arrived at or much of anything else. When I get the end of year accounts from the companies in which I have shares they're a good inch thick, with tiny fonts and so many exceptions, allocations, dispensations and so on that I'd need a good year just to read them and a team of accountants to decipher them. If Google are giving away nearly all their profits to HMRC (as he's trying to insinuate) then why doesn't he go into detail?