Yet, curiously, the article is headed
"It’s Not a Lack of Technology That’s Keeping Trains From Going Driverless". But the article writer takes a simplistic view, talking only about
radar-based adaptive cruise-control systems fitted to most luxury cars these days and not the highly sophisticated radar and algorithmic software used in aircraft and Maglev trains. and has failed to take into account the ultra high speed train systems, such as Maglev, TGV and even HS1 where the speed of the train is far too great to be left in the hands of a human, whose reaction time is simply too slow. Quite a few of those commenting at the end of the article also take issue with the writer, as I'm sure you noticed...
Back in 2011 the International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research published papers on FIS (Fuzzy Inference Systems) and EM (Environment management). Radar software can be employed which 'reads' the track clearly for much further ahead than a human and can discern differences between rubbish dumped on the line and the clean track. Additionally, all high speed tracks currently operating are highly maintained, separated from roads and other 'risky' areas and devoid of crossings and most points. If you isolate the tracks and ensure they're highly maintained and exhibit a distinctive radar and electro-mechanical profile, then trains can run autonomously.
And don't forget: at 130 mph the average human driver is covering almost 200 feet per second and certainly can't see detail as far ahead as a top-rated radar system. The human eye is sensitive, but the brain is
easily fooled and we can only judge distance up to about 60 feet, without something on which to base scale, and
even then we're easily fooled.Finally, don't forget that we see everything upside down and depend on our brains to rectify the inversion. But, as I've shown, brains are easily fooled...