I wouldn't describe Neil Oliver as "an extreme right wing pundit".
Well, he is a pundit ("An expert in a particular subject or field who is frequently called upon to give their opinions to the public: political pundits were tipping him for promotion:
OED") and he must be extremely right wing to have a job working for GB News...
His views challenge the official line in many ways and his points are often valid in my opinion.
Such as vaccination, climate change, Child vaccinations, lockdown, his apparent belief in conspiracy theories, antisemitism...it's a long list. Which do you agree with?
The mainstream UK media has its own agenda and presents a very biased account of news and political affairs.
Can you provide some examples of BBC or ITV being "very biased" in their news stances?
I think it is defamatory to call him, "delusional or paranoid". I am sure that the establishment in the UK would go along with that as it suits their purpose. I don't agree with everything he says but believe he has a right to say it. Overall I support his views and think he gets it right most of the time.
It's worth looking at what he's saying and doing; he's resigned the presidency of the National Trust Scotland, argued in an interview that slavery cannot be considered genocide because ?otherwise there wouldn't be so many damn blacks in Africa or in Britain? and seems to have been an ardent Trump supporter in both refusing to wear a mask or get vaccinated.
He said "?
If your freedom means I might catch Covid, then so be it. If my freedom means you might catch Covid, then so be it. For the sake of freedom, yours and mine together, I will cheerfully risk catching Covid." Which sparked anger among his online associates, producing comments such as ?
So would you cheerfully risk passing it onto me? I?m immune suppresses so you might as well be giving me a death sentence.?" and
"I?ve got stage four cancer, you wouldn?t know meeting me. Please consider wearing a mask in enclosed spaces to protect medically vulnerable people.?
Fundamentally, I do not disagree with your assertion that "overall (you) support his views and think he gets it right most of the time. You are also entitled to your belief.
"The mainstream UK media has its own agenda and presents a very biased account of news and political affairs" but if how and what he says threatens the very fabric of society, which it might, then I believe it would be wrong to agree with it.